Criterion 5 · Staff competenciesMajor non-conformity

Indicator 22 — Developing staff competencies

You must maintain and develop the competencies of your employees and contributors over time: identify needs, plan professional development actions and prove their delivery — including for the head of a one-person organisation.

Applies to: OF · CFA · VAE · CBC

Indicator 22 complements indicator 21: having proven your contributors are competent today, you must show they will remain so tomorrow. The framework expects genuine competency maintenance: needs identification, training or professionalisation actions, and delivery evidence. It applies to all staff — trainers, administrators — and to the owner personally when they deliver the training.

What the auditor checks on the day

The auditor looks for a living system, not a theoretical document. They examine:

  • how you identify needs: professional interviews, self-diagnoses, session evaluation feedback, regulatory changes in your sector;
  • a competency development plan, however simple, listing planned actions per person per year;
  • delivery evidence: training certificates, webinar attestations, invoices, followed programmes, professional subscriptions;
  • the variety of recognised formats: formal training, conferences, trade shows, communities of practice, co-development, documented specialist reading;
  • for employers, compliance with the Labour Code's professional interviews;
  • the full loop: a need identified, an action delivered, an effect observed on the services.

At an initial audit, the auditor accepts a recent plan, but wants at least one action already delivered or under way and a credible calendar.

Achieving compliance, step by step

  1. Create a competency development table: one row per person, with identified needs, planned actions, dates and delivery status.
  2. Feed it from concrete sources: an end-of-course evaluation flagging a delivery weakness, new sector regulations, a new teaching tool to master.
  3. Plan at least one professionalisation action per person per year: a course, a certifying webinar, a trade show, active membership of a professional network.
  4. Archive each proof on receipt: attestation, invoice, digital badge, programme. One "professionalisation" folder per person prevents pre-audit panic.
  5. For employees, keep the professional interview calendar and the signed summaries: the auditor may request them as needs-identification evidence.

Field advice

If you are an independent trainer, this indicator concerns you first and foremost: your own upskilling is the expected evidence. A train-the-trainer course, an attested MOOC, a renewed trade certification or documented active participation in a professional network all qualify. The classic mistake is declaring "I read a lot" with no trace: turn that watch into evidence by logging the conferences attended and keeping the attestations.

Systematically connect this indicator to your other obligations: needs spotted in beneficiary evaluations (indicator 30) and your watch activities (indicators 23 to 25) are excellent inputs for the plan. This cross-indicator coherence impresses auditors, because it shows an integrated quality system rather than a collection of binders.

On subcontractors: you do not have to fund their training, but if you work with them regularly, show that you periodically verify their competencies are current — for example by requesting an updated CV and recent attestations every year.

Finally, size the system to your structure. A two-person organisation needs no HR software: a shared table and an evidence folder suffice. What triggers a non-conformity is the total absence of documented professionalisation over the audited period, not the modesty of the plan.

Evidence file

The evidence the auditor expects

  1. P.1Competency development plan or table per person per year
  2. P.2Attestations and certificates of training followed, including by the owner
  3. P.3Registration invoices for courses, conferences or trade shows
  4. P.4Signed professional interview summaries for employees
  5. P.5Evidence of participation in networks or communities of practice
  6. P.6Documented link between identified needs (evaluations, watch) and delivered actions
Points of vigilance

Common mistakes in audits

  • No professionalisation action delivered or planned over the period
  • A theoretical training plan with no delivery evidence
  • Forgetting the owner-trainer in the competency development system
  • Declaring self-training with no verifiable trace
  • Missing or untraced professional interviews for employees
  • A plan disconnected from the real needs raised by evaluations and watch
Frequently asked questions

FAQ — indicator 22

+What must a competency development plan contain for Qualiopi?

At minimum: the people concerned, the identified needs, the planned actions (course, webinar, trade show, network), the deadlines and the delivery status. A simple, updated table backed by the matching attestations suffices for a small organisation.

+Must an independent trainer keep training to keep Qualiopi?

Yes. Indicator 22 applies to the owner-trainer: at least one documented professionalisation action per audited period is expected. A course, a certification, an attested MOOC or active participation in a professional network all qualify.

+Do free webinars count as evidence for indicator 22?

Yes, provided you keep a trace: participation attestation, confirmation email, programme and exploitation notes. The auditor accepts varied formats as long as they are documented and tied to an identified need.

Same criterion